Rome Total War Barbarian Invasion Unit Id List
Rome Remastered Cheats
Rome Total War Roman Units

Rome: Total War General & Remastered Discussion.i need a unit id list. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
Rome: Total War how to create unit using cheat, cheat and units names bellowYou can see also: How to play Rome: Total War multiplayer campaign: https://youtu.
Rome: Total War Rome: TW - Unit Guide: The Seleucid Empire Units of The Seleucid Empire. Rome: TW - Unit Guide: The Seleucid Empire Rome: Total War. Grand Theft Auto Series: GTA 3 - Vice City - San Andreas - GTA IV - Liberty City Stories: Home Forums Submit News.

Comments - 18 in total

Page: 1,2

Page; Discussion; View; View source; History; 1,627 articles on this wiki Game Info About Rome: Total War Barbarian Invasion Alexander Library Units Buildings Factions Technology Tree Community Resources Affiliate Websites Tools and tech resources Mod downloads. War Room Rome Starting Guides Mastering Battles Conquering the. Rome Total War Unit Code: All Roman Greek and Carthaginian Units createunit 'place of destination' 'unit code' 5 9 3 3. Romans: roman peasant roman archer roman archer auxillia roman velite. Does not fucking work what a gay list u got switch between. 5 9 9 9 9, and 5 9 3 3 any one doesn't belief this try Roman hastati on this list with the. Extract subtitle on dvd.

Only show golden comments

almightyjimbob

Jun 4, 2010, 11:11 am

please excuse spelling errors...coffee gives me jittery hands lol. I recommend reading Warfare in the Ancient world by Brian Todd Carey, and a book which I think is called 'Warfare in the classical world', with hoplite's face on the front. Alas, I have lost the second one, so can't be more specific :(

almightyjimbob

Jun 4, 2010, 11:08 am

just wanna throw in my penny's worth...
The Phalanx, in order to be successful, really had to be use as part of a combined arms force. By itself, it could pulverise most things in front of it, but was (obviously, and as has been said before) vulnerable to the flanks and rear. A group of phalanxes acquired considerable greater flexibility, as the could adopt a number of formations such as wedges, refused flanks, boxes etc, and when the phalangites were well drilled, such as under alexander, the formation of the phalanx itself (the Syntagma) was flexible. This said, it required cavalry to be truly effective - the point of the phalanx wa to act as an 'anvil2 for the cavalry's 'hammer', which is ALWAYS how Alexander used them (in fact, he used pretty much the same tactic in every battle...screen the left with lights, central phalanx, heavy charge on the right). Once you get into the successor states, cavalry declined in importance, and they tended to rely on phalanxes by themselves, pluse elephants, massively reducing the capabilities of the army, as the phalanx, while formidable, needs support.
The roman maniple, however, was superlatively flexible and versatile, and could comfortable operate against mostly any enemy it came across virtually unsupported, giving it a monstrously wide range of capabilities. If this weren't enough, the roman weapons fit was perfect for cracking open the phalanx. The pilae would be used to disrupt the front of the phalanx, thus allowing the legionary to get in close with his gladius, protected by his tower shield. Thereafter, the phalangite was at a sever disadvantage, since, while skilled with his Sarissa, he was much less capable, and less well armoureed, to come close up with his Xiphos. As such, while a formed phalanx presented a formidable obstacle for anyone, once broken open by the pilae, they were virtually dead men. Had cavalry been invvoled, things would have turned out differently, as that would have enable the greeks, macedonians and successor states to counter the legion by using the phalanx for its original purpose, rather than the primary striking arm of the army.
As an aside, the hellenic way of waging war also put them at a disadvantage against the romans - if a small skirmish was experienced, then burial ceremonies often took place a s a sort of 'pep talk', with the bodies open to see. However, when Pyrrhus did this at Cynoscephelae, the phalangites, used to neat puncture wounds from the Xyston and Sarissa, were horrified by the brutal hacking apart of the bodies by the gladius, both in combat, and when the legionaries performed their usual drill of stabbing the corpses of the enemy as they passed over them, makings sure they were dead. As such, the phalanxes went into the battle rather unhappy...
THEREFORE.....Combined arms phalanx system superior to Maniple Legion, Maniple legion massively superior to phalanx. Caesar vs alexander...now that would be interesting....
so, penny worth added, I think :D

ciaofranco

Dec 16, 2009, 08:08 pm

For more information about the Phalanx versus infantry debate I would recommend that you read The Art of War by Machiavelli it discusses in great depth and detail benefits of Pike Men (phalanx) and Shield bearers (cohorts) and argues the point that the most effective armies are composed of a combination of the two as GRUPI has suggested.

tau434

Nov 7, 2009, 06:57 am

One of the things that puzzles me every time on these unit guides is the person complaining how bad and useless the Greek generals are and how you should never play them. I have a different theory on this.
The truth: Unless it's a one on one battle, it doesn't matter how good or bad your general is statistics wise. It's how you use him that matters. If you're having a one on one fight with the opposing general, then something is wrong with your strategy. Your general should NEVER fight another general head on and alone, no matter how good he is. For example, while the Macedonian General is quite bad, if you combine him with Macedonian Cavalry, you produce an effective fighting force that is both highly motivated and deadly. However, you may argue that the Greeks have a low statistics general, but no heavy cavalry. For this, you should give your General a unit of Greek cavalry, but only use him to chase down routers and flank the enemy. While most generals are meant to be heavy cavalry, one must learn that each faction's fighting style is different. Back to the Greek example, the player must rely on their hopilites, not their cavarly, to carry the day
On the other hand, the Roman General is one of the best in the game, but even he should have some Legionary or Praetorian cavalry surrounding him.
This is especially true i

Rome Total War Unit Id List